Tuesday, May 28, 2013
Star Trek: Into Darkness - Thoughts
The 2009 reboot of Star
Trek was incredibly well received, by both sci-fi fans, and general
audiences. So the news of the sequel, Star
Trek Into Darkness, was music to the ears of many an avid moviegoer. The
trailer was action packed, and unlike the origins theme of its predecessor,
added a veil of mystery and made things look intense. In Into Darkness, the Enterprise crew, after a big shake up in the
Starfleet ranks, set off to pursue a rogue officer, in unsafe Klingon space.
After a pretty long runtime by English movie standards, I’d
say that if you sat through it, watched it, and enjoyed it, you’re probably a Star Trek junkie or a sci-fi aficionado.
While the first movie was aimed at general audiences, and favored pop
culture and entertainment, the second is clearly for the strongly sci-fi
inclined. If you don’t believe me, the folks fast asleep in the theater when
the credits rolled, with their 3D glassed still on, will need to serve as
proof. Star Trek Into Darkness has a
strong story, and requires for you to follow it fairly seriously. The plot has
its share of twists, and knowledge of the 1982 Star Trek movie, Star Trek
II: The Wrath of Khan adds to the overall story-line. Personally I have not
seen it, so I don’t believe it’s mandatory. There’s a good deal of action, and
the grey super starship that audiences are exposed to is pretty cool. Character
development from the first movie is evident, and seems gradual and realistic.
At over 2 hours, the movie is engaging as the plot unfolds, coupled with the
action, but only if sci-fi is your thing.
As someone who enjoys Star Trek,
I did, and I’m sure most others like me will; but if you don’t follow Star Trek and aren't into sci-fi, I fear
that you will find Star Trek Into
Darkness a tad boring. Overall story evolution is excellent though, with
the movie ending on a note that sets the stage for the original Star Trek TV serial.
Pretty much the entire cast from the 2009 movie is back.
They have all grown into their roles well, seeming like fitting modern day
representations of their counterparts from a generation before. Chekov played
by Anton Yelchin is one such example, and interestingly a not so key role, that
was yet convincingly portrayed; the situational humor surrounding his character
coming out well. All the actors, including Chris
Pine, Zachary
Quinto, and Zoe
Saldana, have grown into the more developed
characters well, coming across a lot more sure footed in their ways. It’s hard
though to watch Zachary Quinto and not be reminded of the TV show Heroes. While he might make an okay
Spock, much of the Star Trek
audiences are partial to the legendary Leonard Nimoy. A notable addition to the
cast is Peter Weller who stars as Marcus. Famous for his performance as RoboCop, it was interesting to see him
in a senior and very human role.
Since I was keen to check this one out, I decided to hit
the theater. I was lucky to get a nice
3D and Dolby Atmos combo. Video was good, looking clear and stylized; in the
sense that blueish whites were noticeably stronger, reminding us all that this
was the future aboard a Starship. This was my second Atmos experience, and was
very immersive. The sound truly felt like it was all around, and I didn't get
the feeling that the sound was originating from any specific source; rather I
felt enveloped in it. From 2 experiences so far, I personally feel that Dolby
Atmos is not going to wow you, but it will give you an extremely immersive
experience.
My Recommendation: Watch
It (A fair progression to the Star Trek reboot)
Saturday, May 11, 2013
The Incredible Hulk - Thoughts
As part of my run up to The Avengers, I figured I should quickly catch-up on the individual
Marvel superhero movies I’d missed. While I’d seen the 2003 Hulk movie with Eric Bana, I was yet to
see the 2008 The Incredible Hulk
movie. From what I was told it did tie into The
Avengers movie, but only very minimally. In this second iteration of the
Hulk, which served as a reboot owing to the mixed reception of the 2003
edition, Bruce Banner is part of a military program; which goes wrong forcing
him to flee the United States. In an attempt to cure himself he returns 5 years
later, and is now forced to battle the demons he once fled.
The opening sequences of the movie where a
good part of the back-story is explained using the opening credits, was quite
unique and interesting. It related well to the comic origins of the Hulk
character, and contributed to a charged beginning. The movie was relatively
long, with plenty of slow story evolution and deep drama moments. That said there
were multiple action sequences, where the sheer brute strength of the mammoth
Hulk was at large and for the audiences to enjoy. Unlike many other superhero
movies, Bruce Banner is clearly consumed by darkness and pain. Due to this The Incredible Hulk is nothing like the
loud and wacky Iron Man franchise. Whether you’re a comic book freak or a die-hard
action movie buff, The Incredible Hulk
is worth the watch. Thanks to its strong narrative elements, it has more depth
than most random action flicks. I personally felt that the final battle was
weaker than what I’d have liked, but that might just be me. Truth be told, it
did feel like a comic book ending. Though it isn't necessary to see this movie
before other movies in the marvel series, it does tie in well into the overall story-line.
Edward Norton who played Bruce Banner and The
Hulk was perfect, as the distraught man who had fled the US Army special
project, and was living in hiding. He wasn't the typical superhero, and his
portrayal of Bruce Banner did justice to the reality and hardship of a man cut
off from his past, and living a lonely sad life. Liv Tyler played Betty Ross,
Bruce’s love interest, and someone he had to let go of when he was forced to flee.
She too did well as the caring, ever understanding companion, who had missed
him dearly, and was ready to take him back and help him, even after the cut off
for several years. Tim Roth plays Emil Blonsky, the special ops soldier who
unlike most other soldiers develops a vendetta to battle the Hulk, and goes
about it, round after round, mercilessly. His low on values, ruthless ways lent itself well
towards the general’s almost mercenary agenda.
Being unable to place my hands on a Region 1
US DVD, I was forced to acquire and sample an HD rip of the movie. The source
for the rip was a Blueray, and the rip resolution was 720p. Colors were vivid,
but the tone was a tad dark, especially in the non-daylight scenes. This was
probably intentional and to do with the darker narrative elements of the Bruce
/ Hulk character. Sound was presented by means of a DTS 5.1 soundtrack, and was
pretty on point. Action sequences were loud and had impact, while dialog was
clear, and the general ambiance calm in places, in keeping with plot elements.
My Recommendation: Watch It (A dark retelling of the Hulk
story)
Sunday, March 17, 2013
Sathi Leelavathi - Thoughts
Having
just recently started reviewing Tamil movies, Sathi Leelavathi was an interesting addition to the mix, as it was
the first non-blockbuster, being a drama comedy at the core. It was brought to
my attention by a friend who said it was an older comedy, worth watching, as it
starred Kamal Hassan in an impressive comedy role. Going into it I had very
little in terms of expectations, assuming it would be a run of the mill comedy.
As
the movie opened and things kicked off, the first thing that hit me was the
dated look the movie had. Not having watched an older Tamil movie like this in
ages, it quite stood out. Also worth mention was the seemingly low budget feel,
a clear contrast to recent blockbusters I had watched, and the non mega-star
status surrounding Kamal Hassan. In fact, his role was more in the form of a
supporting actor, providing comic relief to the plot. The bulk of the movie
focuses on a married mans interest in a younger unmarried girl, who in turn is
in pursuit of a wealthy man. The plot is very simple, and the execution is also
pretty straight forward and almost stereotype. Don’t expect twists and
complexity; Sathi Leelavathi is
indeed quite simplistic. While some parts of the narrative are not intended to
be funny, sophisticated audience groups will find scenes funny, due to its
almost laughable dialog and execution. This is very apparent in the opening
sequences of the movie, where the lead character makes an effort to pursue his
lady interest. The quality comedy really kicks in wherever Kamal Hasan is
present, and is at its peak towards the closing of the movie. The humor is
largely situational in nature. If you’re in the mood for a casual watch, which
is fun and somewhat dated, Sathi
Leelavathi is worth checking out; just don’t expect something standout. Listen
to it like it were on the radio while doing something else and you’ll still
have watched the movie.
In
short most of the performances are poor to average at best, with Kamal Hassan
being the only exception, who is undoubtedly in a different league. He plays
Shaktivel, a doctor who is the college classmate of the lead character. As
usual his character portrayal is remarkable and Kamal Hassan lives the
Shaktivel character; bringing to life the nuances and animation in a manner
that perhaps even the real Shaktivel, if there were one, would not be able to
outdo. Ramesh Aravind plays Arunachalam, the married lead in pursuit of the
younger pretty girl Priya, played by Heera Rajgopal. Ramesh does an okay job,
his performance often leaning towards overdone. Heera’s performance for most
part was below average; though going by memory I have seen her do better. So
I’d think that this was one of her early movies, where her inexperience was
evident.
The
content I was sampling was a lossy DivX rip, of medium bitrate, weighing in at
around 1 gig for a 2 and a half hour movie. Video looked dated, with colors
looking dull and severely lacking vibrancy. Clarity again was poor to average,
especially in today’s day and age of high-definition. My guess would be that
the original content in itself was not of superior grade, with the DivX
compression further degrading it. Sound was presented by means of a 2 channel
stereo soundtrack. Dialog which was vital was clearly audible, but nowhere near
the fidelity of a modern 5.1 dedicated center channel presentation.
My
Recommendation: Dicey (A comic Kamal
Hassan from the mid 90’s)
Unnaipol Oruvan - Thoughts
Unnaipol Oruvan (Someone
Like You) is
certainly worth mention, as it’s the first ever Tamil movie I’ve decided to
review. While I wasn’t keeping track of it around its release in 2009, I got my
first whiff of it a few months ago when I saw bits of it on cable TV while having
dinner. Realizing that it came across as quite sophisticated and interesting, I
decided to get a hold of it and check it out. In Unnaipol Oruvan an individual of unknown origin or connections
makes threats to the I G of police regarding bombs placed across the city. In
exchange for details on their locations, he requires the release of 4 specific
terrorists. His agenda and his motive remain key questions as the plot unfolds.
Interestingly online research pointed to the fact that Unnaipol Oruvan is a remake of the 2008 Bollywood / Hindi movie, A Wednesday.
To
those familiar with Tamil movies, expect to be shocked; there are no song and
dance sequences, and similarly there are no fight sequences either. Yes, at
this point most average Tamil movie goers would be in a state of alarm. In
short Unnaipol Oruvan is aimed at
advanced audiences, who are looking for something intellectual. In my opinion
from a narrative perspective Unnaipol
Oruvan is near perfect, with the plot being strong, and the execution and
delivery being faultless. Even without the usual drama by means of songs, fights,
and special effects the movie is immensely gripping, and carries its weight
flawlessly. In addition the movie has a very real and everyday feel to it,
which audiences should be able to relate to easily. It feels modern, current,
and not over the top like many blockbuster movies. The level of detail given to
every scene, and the strong dialogues are memorable. If you aren’t in the mood
for a serious movie experience, you should save Unnaipol Oruvan for another day. That said, it is one of the best
Tamil movies I have ever seen, and though it’s a gripping suspense crime drama,
it’s not gruesome in anyway, and should appeal to a wide audience, as long as
they are looking for substance.
The
success of Unnaipol Oruvan largely rests
on the excellent performances all round. Leading the ensemble is Kamal Hassan,
who is known for his stellar performances. Whether it be emotion, or dictating
terms, he does it with a level of realism that’s unquestionable. Pay attention
and you will wonder whether he lives his roles or just acts them. Mohanlal
plays the I G of Police, also doing very well, coming across as fair, grounded,
and logical. He is so convincing that Id go out on a limb and say that if the
Chennai police force were in his able hands, I’d rest easier every night. The
supporting roles of Arif and Inspector Sethu are played by Ganesh Venkatraman
and Bharath Reddy respectively. Though those are unfamiliar names, their
performances are impressive, and the way their individual characters develop
through the course of the plot is commendable.
I
was lucky to get my hands on a solid HD 1080p rip of Unnaipol Oruvan, from a Blueray source. Video was clear and sharp.
Colors were bright, and on a widescreen HD TV, it was a crisp enjoyable
presentation. Facial detail was phenomenal in the close-ups, but some outdoor
scene looked slightly over exposed. Sound was presented by means of a 6 channel
5.1 DTS surround soundtrack. Dialog was perfectly delivered through the center
channel, and there was suitable use of the surround stage in multiple scenes.
Technically Unnaipol Oruvan was just
right, leaving literally nothing to be wanted, while not being overdone.
My
Recommendation: Watch It + (A near
perfect crime drama that sets the bar for Tamil cinema)
Sunday, February 24, 2013
Mama - Thoughts
Mama is
a 2013 horror movie that somehow slipped through my radar. I wasn’t aware of it
till I was told of it playing at a popular multiplex by a friend. I looked up
the trailer, found it fairly interesting and decided to go check it out,
especially considering that it’s been ages since I’ve seen a decent horror
flick. Following an accident two young children are stranded in the woods,
being forced to live alone. 5 years later they are found and joined with their
uncle, who tries to raise them with his girlfriend. The question is, have the
little girls come alone, and is everything as straightforward as it seems, and
therein lies the premise of Mama.
After the recent slew of slasher movies and other reality-esque horror movies, it was nice to come back to something solid, which reminded me of The Ring. I felt that I could draw a lot of parallels between Mama and The Ring, with Mama successfully using some of The Rings strengths. The mysterious backstory adds a layer of intrigue that keeps the audience glued, while pacing is also managed well to avoid any boring moments. I don’t recall any instances during the movies 110 minute runtime when my mind briefly wandered away. In terms of the sheer chills, Mama worked well, showing just enough, teasing just right, and slowly building up to the eventual ghastliness of the Mama character. What was unique were the traits associated to Mama, which made sense as the plot evolved, and can also be related to by the audiences. A clear theme all throughout is the mother and child bond; be it to do with the Mama character or Annabel. While there are some stereotypes, and cliché’s, nothing that was laughable. Some of the editing and scene planning was predictable, but personally I did not find the horror cheesy, and quite liked the movie. Was Mama scary? Indeed it was! If you’re in the mood for a good horror flick, I’d certainly recommend this one.
After the recent slew of slasher movies and other reality-esque horror movies, it was nice to come back to something solid, which reminded me of The Ring. I felt that I could draw a lot of parallels between Mama and The Ring, with Mama successfully using some of The Rings strengths. The mysterious backstory adds a layer of intrigue that keeps the audience glued, while pacing is also managed well to avoid any boring moments. I don’t recall any instances during the movies 110 minute runtime when my mind briefly wandered away. In terms of the sheer chills, Mama worked well, showing just enough, teasing just right, and slowly building up to the eventual ghastliness of the Mama character. What was unique were the traits associated to Mama, which made sense as the plot evolved, and can also be related to by the audiences. A clear theme all throughout is the mother and child bond; be it to do with the Mama character or Annabel. While there are some stereotypes, and cliché’s, nothing that was laughable. Some of the editing and scene planning was predictable, but personally I did not find the horror cheesy, and quite liked the movie. Was Mama scary? Indeed it was! If you’re in the mood for a good horror flick, I’d certainly recommend this one.
The cast of Mama
was largely new to me. Jessica Chastain plays the lead role of Annabel. Between
the makeup, dressing, and the look she totally fit the ‘rock band girlfriend’
part, which interestingly plays into the story, as the narrative forces her
character to develop, and she does justice to this forced situational
transition. Isabelle Nélisse plays Lilly, the younger of the two children, and
does fabulously as the misguided confused kid, too young to discern the
difference between normal and strange. She excels in the area of facial
expressions, to a point where her capability in relation to her age astounds
me. Other notable roles include Nikolaj Coster-Waldau as Lucas and Megan
Charpentier as Victoria, the two girls’ uncle and the elder girl respectively.
Both do decently well in their roles. Interestingly the demonic Mama character,
whom by narrative is of female origin is played by Javier Botet. If anything
this just surprised me in afterthought.
I checked this one out in the theatre, and interestingly
this was my first ever Dolby Atmos experience. To the uninitiated, Dolby Atmos
is the next big sound technology after 5.1/7.1 surround. In simple terms, think
several speakers spread across the roof overhead, some behind the wide screen,
and pretty much all along the sides, with up to 64 independent channels of
sound. The intent being to provide a more
immersive listening experience, with ultra-realistic pans, beyond the front to
back, and left to right that we are traditionally used to. Sadly I don’t have
too much in terms of specific feedback on the new Atmos technology, but I will
admit that I did feel superbly enveloped by the sound. There was frankly no
escaping the eeriness. I will need to watch more movies, and perhaps experience
both regular and Atmos versions to tell the difference better. Picture quality was
good, as can be expected nowadays with digital theatre presentations. The movie
had a noticeable dull tone, favoring darker browns. There were no vibrant
colors used. Picture was sharp, with no grain or blur effects.
My Recommendation: Watch
It (Never underestimate a mother’s love)
Monday, November 12, 2012
Star Trek: First Contact - Thoughts
I recall watching the trailer for Star Trek: First Contact back in 1996, around the time of the
movie’s release. Seeing the trailer you’d expect to the see the Star Trek Next Generation crew in battle with the alien Borg, in mammoth
galactic space combat. The movie also comes across as a hardcore action flick,
with Data being in the midst of the Borg’s capture, assimilate, and transform
plan. Though I was very keen on watching
the movie at the time, I don’t recall what stopped me. I finally got around to
watching it last night, a good 16 years after its release.
Perhaps the most obvious observation will be the dated look
that the movie has, especially in the Sci-fi space. The spaceship CGI is
acceptable but lacking by today’s standards, and the sets don’t look as cool as
we’d expect the 24th century to be. The rest is probably in keeping
with Star Trek Next Generation standards, as the movie feels a lot like the TV
serial. All the familiar faces are back, and the plot has the usual exploration
– entanglement – plan – twist – climax – resolution, formula. There are hardly
any space battle sequences, and the trailer probably showcases more than 70% of
the spaceship battles. There are plenty of slower moments with the earths
inhabitants set in the late 21st century. If you’re a fan of the franchise, you’ll
quite enjoy the big clash with the Borg; but on the flip side if you’re just
looking for some Sci-fi action Star Trek:
First Contact is dated and limited in its scope.
In terms of performances, you’ll find that it’s quite the
mixed bag. Captain Picard played by Patrick Stewart is quite impressive, and is
the grounding force to the movie. He drives the narrative, and carries the plot
through from start to end. Brent Spiner plays Data, the android crew member,
and also a key character in the Star
Trek: First Contact plot. He does particularly well in playing the android,
experiencing physical emotion and stimulation for the first time. The third and
possibly only other notable performance comes from James Cromwell who stars as
Zefram Cochran. He does surprisingly well in portraying the eccentric scientist
with a love for alcohol. Many of the other crew members put in pretty average
performances. Jonathan Frakes plays Commander Riker, and is annoying for most
part with his lousy grin. Also silly and forgettable is Troi, played by Marina
Sirtis. I used to watch this show, but since it was so long ago I don’t
specifically remember the quality of the performances very well; my guess is
that it must have been average all along.
The content I was sampling was a high definition 720p
BlueRay rip. Video was clear, but there was a slightly faded look, which if my
memory serves me right is how the TV show looked. It can partially be
attributed to degradation during lossy compression as well probably. Sound was
presented by means of a Dolby Digital 5.1 soundtrack. Dialog was perfect, and
with a good part of the movie being slower dialog moments, this worked. There
was some noticeable surround usage, but it wasn’t anything spectacular.
My Recommendation: Watch
It – (The Next Generation Crew’s first big Borg face-off)
Sunday, October 21, 2012
Resident Evil: Retribution - Thoughts
While the Dark
Knight Rises and The Avengers
were perhaps 2012’s most anticipated movies, Resident Evil: Retribution is what I was truly waiting for.
Considering my home theatre screening preference, I’d have been okay seeing the
others on DVD with a delay, but for Resident
Evil: Retribution, noway hosay! I actually gave thought to tickets on the
first day. As it is, I was unhappy that the India release was about 2 weeks
after the world release. Honestly I cannot think of any other movie that I’ve
wanted to see as bad in the recent years. In this fifth installment of the
franchise, Alice
needs to form new alliances, to take on the all-consuming T-virus threat, and
the Umbrella Corporation
I
love sci-fi action movies, but I think the Resident
Evil franchise is at a level of appreciation that trumps most others. The
concept of an enormous private corporation with seemingly surplus funding and
resources, that has fantabulous underground facilities all over the world,
poses a threat that shadows all else. Add to that the action and the
thriller/horror elements, and what we have is a winner in my eyes. Interestingly
the trailer didn’t give away too much, and most audiences were going into
installment 5 just expecting to see the ongoing struggle further escalate and
take new shape. It truly was a case of, ‘What’s in store for Alice next?’ Since I don’t want to give away
too much, let me just say that the plot development is both interesting and
realistic; in the sense that it’s a plausible next step to Resident Evil: Afterlife. The action sequences are simply stellar,
making good use of bullet time, thus slowing down the action and amplifying its
magnitude. The combination of hand to hand and projectile combat is superb and
meshed together beautifully. The narrative process was quite riveting, and
except for the interval never did I look at my phone, or notice my mind wander
off. Even with high expectations for the already impressive franchise, Paul W S
Anderson has done a remarkable job with Resident
Evil: Retribution. If you’re familiar with the series, this installment is
similar to the first, which is set largely within one of Umbrella Corps mega
facilities. Assuming you like the theme/premise or are a fan of the franchise,
you will not be disappointed. Even if you’re just in the mood for a good stand-alone sci-fi action movie, you’ll probably like it.
With
the franchise having traversed as long, Alice ’s
character played by Milla Jovovich has probably seen a good deal of character
development, not to mention physical change over the years. At this point it’s
fair to say that the Alice character and actress
Milla have largely merged, with Alice ’s
character adapting to Milla’s reality, and not just vice versa. Milla Jovovich
brings to screen her usual ‘A’ game, comprising incredible and totally
believable action, with the usual survival horror sorta drama. It’s fair to ask
at this point if Milla Jovovich has been typecast. Welcome back to the action Jill Valentine
played by Sienna Guillory, in her new blonde and evil avatar. Her performance
is acceptable, and she does justice to the fight sequences. New to the movie
franchise is Ada Wong, played by Bingbing Li. She lives up to her video game
persona, and joins the ranks of other Resident
Evil women who can successfully pull of over the top action and stunt
sequences in a dress that certainly isn’t meant for it. For those familiar with
Lost, expect to see Kevin Durand, who
plays the role of Barry Burton, one of the mercenaries who fights the Umbrella
Corporation alongside Alice .
Since
I was pretty frantic about seeing Resident
Evil: Retribution, it was sampled at the theatre. The screen setup was
35mm, and the sound acoustics were good thanks to the smaller room dimensions.
Predominant colors in true Resident Evil fashion were dark blue, red, and
white. Most of the sequences were indoors, and there were contrasting dark
hues, and white; the later mostly being artificially lit indoor areas. Picture
was pretty good, and the use of 3D was quite a bit, with elements from the
action sequences regularly flying into the audiences. Editing and the technical
elements were used effectively to add a sense of intensity to the action
sequences. Similarly the positional sound worked well with the movie and its
action to add to the level of audience immersion. The score composed by
tomandandy made the action uber enjoyable, and was very impressive. The same
goes for the end credits song Hexes produced by Bassnectar featuring Chino
Moreno (of the Deftones) on vocals; totally loved the music!
My
Recommendation: Watch It + (New
fights with old foes and deadlier viruses!)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)